About International Statistics for Water Services

This report is now in its sixteenth edition, and this update contains data from 46 countries and more than 250 cities worldwide. This report enables high-level comparisons concerning abstraction, consumption, tariff structure and regulation of water services globally.

These data provide a starting point for debate on how services can be or should be financed, the importance of water tariff structures, and topics like consumption patterns, taxes,  leakages, etc. In general, this information can help organizations set up strategies from a holistic management perspective.

Water under pressure

Water price structure and water pricing are not stand-alone mechanisms to ensure sustainable water use. In fact, sustainability can only be obtained by change of the customer behaviour directly linked to the awareness of scarcity of the water resources all over the world.

The one and best solution to an ideal water tariff structure does not exist. But we can state that water companies, par definition, are so called “fixed cost” companies. As a consequence, the fixed cost should play a major role in the discussion about water billing. Of course, we have also to take into account that the water bill should reflect the variable costs of a water company, “total cost recovery” being the ultimate goal.

The water footprint: a huge concern?

The consumption of potable water is widely variable, with a large gap between cities in our research. Household consumption per capita varies from 14 liters per capita per day in Muranga, Kenya, to 547 liters per capita per day in Denver, USA: a factor of 39.

A very important factor in the discussion of affordability of the water bill is the global fiscal pressure in a country. Although taxes (like VAT) are an important part of the water bill, there is no standardization. There is a wide range from 0% to 27%  for the VAT in the mentioned countries. Also a significant trend in a number of countries is a divergence of the VAT charged on water and wastewater – a low VAT for potable water and a higher VAT for wastewater collection and treatment. This stems from the desire to keep water bills affordable, as potable water is a human right.

In one-third of the cities surveyed, the environmental charges (= total sewerage and wastewater treatment charges) exceed 50% of the total water bill. This helps to explain the remarkably high spread of the total water bill for 200 m³ across the 250 cities, from 24 US$ in Mumbai, India, to almost 2 372 US$ in Moscow, Russia.
The upcoming trend of higher VAT on wastewater in more countries reflects the fact that on one hand, the total cost of wastewater is also really much higher than the total cost of potable water stricto sensu, and on the other hand, the higher VAT being used as an incentive to reduce the environmental footprint of wastewater. But if this is really the purpose, it should be clearly communicated to the customer. The affordability and the ability to pay for the total water bill always need to be considered in this framework.

Whereas VAT is a fiscal tool of the government, water companies also have a major mission to help consumers to reduce their wastewater footprint, by promoting the circular use of water and wastewater. Conserving and protecting the scarce water resources we have today is critical to preserve them for future generations. We all must work together to respond to the challenges associated with climate change.

A shortcut to smart technologies

One of the ultimate goals of water management is total cost recovery, however, this needs to be considered from the perspective of an affordable water bill.

From the point of view of asset management of a water company, there is a lot of value going on. Every percentage of gain in efficiency could have a beneficial effect on the water production cost and on the water bill. New disruptive technologies like intelligent metering and smart water networks will lead to beneficial effects and will allow, for example, more correct sizing of the water assets or to lower the non-revenue water by detecting leakages.

Today, emerging technologies of smart metering based on IoT will accelerate the way to a smart water network. Current daily challenges such as pressure losses, fraud or reverse flow, to name a few, can be detected in real-time at the office, even before the customer is affected.

Tariff growth acceleration

Consumers in many countries feel the effect of increasing operating and capital costs as water and wastewater tariff growth accelerates. The increasing inflation, the climate change impact, the need for proper asset management, the impact of international conflicts on the energy and construction market and the increasing customer expectations represent major changes with impact on the tariff levels.

Our Specialist Group is organizing a workshop at the WWC in Toronto (August 2024) to discuss the tariff evolution from last years, identify the major challenges and their impact and assess the tendencies for the following years. The conclusions will be published on this platform.

About International Statistics for Water Services

The Toronto edition 2024 of the ‘International Statistics for Water Services’ released at the IWA Water World Congress (11-15 August 2024) is an initiative from the IWA Specialist Group on Statistics and Economics (chaired by Ed Smeets, The Netherlands) and coordinated by the Working Group Statistics (chaired by Ann Bijnens, De Watergroep, Belgium).

About the IWA Specialist Group Statistics and Economics

The International Water Association (IWA) is a worldwide network of professionals, which aims to exchange scientific and professional knowledge, provided by academics and water managers, covering many aspects of the water cycle. Our Specialist Group on Statistics and Economics aims to provide a forum to debate how utilities are financed, how their various water tariff structures are, which indicators of performance they use, how they manage efficiency, etc. To achieve these goals, workshops and seminars are organized annually, and papers and books are written with the scope of sharing information and experiences that focus both on fundamental and on practical issues to be considered for the economic and responsible behavior of water utilities.

Ed Smeets
Ed Smeets
IWA Fellow and Chair of IWA’s Specialist Group on Statistics and Economics.
Ann Bijnens
Ann Bijnens
Statistics expert from De Watergroep, Belgium

About the Statistics report, edition Toronto 2024

By means of international surveys, the Working Group Statistics provides professional information on water abstraction, consumption, charges and regulation at the country and city levels. So, we are glad to present this edition of our ‘International Statistics for Water Services’ with an update of data from 46 countries and more than 250 cities.

This Toronto 2024 report, in particular the charges and consumption sections, focuses on the water consumption of households. All the definitions of the several parameters have been discussed and fine-tuned by the members of the Working Group Statistics. For the quantitative information on population, production volumes etc., the years 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020 and 2022 are included. The information about tariffs is based on the consumption of 100 m³ and 200 m³ in 2015, 2017, 2019 and 2021 and 2023. Concerning water charges, making time series is rather difficult, because of variation in the exchange rate in time, when recalculating the local valuta in US dollars.

The water prices do not necessarily reflect the full cost of water services, because some parts of the costs may be covered by sources other than the customer. In some cases, for example, there can be a political or social motivation to ensure that water is supplied at a socially acceptable price. Of course, there are many other factors affecting price levels, but these were out of the scope of this survey.

You are invited to take a closer look at the Copenhagen statistics and build your own graphs. I hope that the facts and figures will add a plus value to your job. Keep in mind that this survey is on a world scale and that you can easily down drill to your country, capital or a particular city.

Become part of the project

The most difficult challenge in making this report is to find the right contact person(s) for the countries. This single point of contact must be able to deliver, at the same time, data for the water sector and some country indicators. If your country is not listed in the Toronto report and if you want to volunteer to provide us with the valuable data of your country, please let us know and send us your contact details to IWA@dewatergroep.be

The making of…

Renato Parena, honorary chairman of the Specialist Group, for the Italian water services, launched the concept of the survey in the early 1990’s. Since that time we have been producing the biennial statistics of water services worldwide. To ‘keep up with the times’ we are proud to present the digital edition of the Statistics for the fifth time, which offers more possibilities than ever before.

Thanks to IWA, we have moved to a digital publishing platform. This will enable greater access to the statistics and permit us to update the data on a regularly base.

Special thanks to our sponsors BDO Romania and STRAT369 Consulting Malaysia who have made it possible that we can offer you this digital platform free to use.

Our main concern is the reliability of the data and quality control. Of course, it is evident that for the data quality we depend on the single points of contact who provided us with the data.

 

Thanks to all water professionals who helped obtain the data for this survey. Thanks to their effort we are able to give a valuable overview of important aspects of water services worldwide.
Albania N. Shani, Water Regulatory Authority
Armenia I. Farr and S. Pouradier-Duteil, Veolia Eau France
Belgium P. Moniotte, Belgaqua and A. Bijnens, De Watergroep
Bulgaria I. Farr and S. Pouradier-Duteil, Veolia Eau France
Canada  M. Amini, D. Main and M. Lerose, AECOM
Chile J. Páez Ilabaca, Super intendencia de Servicios Sanitarios – SISS
Hong Kong SAR, China C. Lau, Water Supplies Department Hong Kong SAR Government
Chinese Taipei G-S. Wang, Chinese Taiwan National Committee
Cyprus P. Potamou, Limassol Water Board
Czech Republic I. Farr and S. Pouradier-Duteil, Veolia Eau France
Denmark T. Sorensen, Danish Water and Wastewater Association
Estonia R. Kärmas, Estonian Waterworks Association
Finland M. Rontu, Finnish Water Utilities Association
France S. Pouradier-Duteil, Veolia Eau France
Germany T. Herkner and J. Rehberg, Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.
Hungary G. Patkó, MaViz
India D. Hanumantha Chary, Indian Water Works Association
Israel O. Slepner, Governmental Authority for Water and Sewage
Italy R. Sciolotto, SMAT S.p.A.
Japan F. Nishu, Japan Water Works Association
Kenya R. Cheruiyot, Water Services Regulatory Board
Kosovo R. Ramaj, Water Services Regulatory Authority
Latvia D. Codare-Plaude, Public Utilities Commission
Lithuania M. Maksimovas, National Energy Regulatory Council
Macao SAR, China N. Kuan, Macao Water
Malaysia R. Mahmud and L. Koon Yew, The Malaysian Water Association
Malta M. Camilleri, Regulator for Energy and Water Services
Mongolia G. Altanchimeg, Erdenet Water and Heat Distribution Network
Montenegro Energy and Water Regulatory Agency of Montenegro
Netherlands P.J.J.G. Geudens, Vewin, Rioned and Unie van Waterschappen
North Macedonia S. Ademi, Energy, Water Services and Municipal waste management services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia
Norway C. F. Nordheim, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Philipinnes N.B. Javier, Philippine Water Works Association
Poland P. Bartoszczuk, Warshau School of Economics
Portugal F. Ruivo, ERSAR
Republic of Moldova The National Agency for Energy Regalation
Romania E. Chiru, Romanian Water Association and T. Popa, Water company Brasov
Russia A. Epstein, Russian Water and Wastewater Association
Rwanda N. Kamana, Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Authority (RURA)
Scotland (UK) A. Blake, Water Industry Comission for Scotland (WICS)
Slovakia R. Wittmanová, Slovak National Committee IWA
South Korea S. Hong, IWA Korean National Committee
Sri Lanka National Water Supply and Drainage Board
Sweden E. Karlsson, Swedish water and wastewater association
Switzerland M. Freiburghaus, Swiss Gass and Water Industry Association
United States of America R. Craley, American Water Works Association and Raftelis Financial Consultants

 

Interpreting the graphs correctly:

  • The explanatory notes give more background information to interpret the data in the right way.
  • All data are on country and city level, NOT on a company level.
  • All financial data are converted to US$, the latest known exchange rate of December 2023.
  • The exchange rates vary in time. Therefore it is not possible to compare charges in time.

Tips and tricks

  • There is a wide range of statistics from abstraction to charges – Select the Statistic Type of data from the list.
  • Depending on the statistic type, you can make a selection of a volume for 100 m³ or 200 m³ and for the years between 2014 and 2023 – Choose the Volume/Year.
  • If you want to compare, please select all cities and/or all countries in the pop-up menu or mark the preferred selection – Select the Countries/Cities.
  • Click the Generate button to see the data you’ve selected.
  • You can Sort by ascending or descending on a specific parameter.
  • By hovering on the bar, you can read the value.
  • By hovering over the country/city, you can consult the available explanatory notes. Extensive notes can be consulted by clicking to view more details.
  • Click the Share button to save the results or share them with others.

Just go digital, visit our platform Statistics and build your own graphs!